obsidian-save

Save current conversation context to an Obsidian note under the `Claude/` directory.

## What to save

Capture all of the following that are relevant to the current conversation:

- **Conversation summary**: What the user is trying to accomplish and why
- **Project context**: Relevant architecture, design decisions, or constraints discovered
- **Task state**: What has been completed, what is in progress, what is blocked or pending
- **Key decisions**: Any choices made and the reasoning behind them
- **Open questions**: Unresolved questions or things to revisit
- **Next steps**: Concrete actions that should follow from this session

## File location

Derive the project name from the current working directory (use the repo or app folder name). Save to:

```
Claude/<project-name>/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<short-slug>.md
```

Use today's date and a short 2-4 word slug describing the session topic (e.g. `2026-04-29-ruth-plugin-setup.md`).

If `` is provided, use it as the slug instead of generating one.

## Note format

Use this structure:

```markdown
---
date: <YYYY-MM-DD>
project: <project-name>
tags: [claude-context]
---

# <Session Title>

## Summary
<1-3 sentence overview of what this session was about>

## Context
<Relevant project background, architecture notes, constraints>

## Decisions
<Decisions made and rationale>

## Task State
<What was completed, in progress, or blocked>

## Open Questions
<Anything unresolved>

## Next Steps
<Concrete follow-up actions>
```

## Steps

1. Determine the project name from the working directory.
2. Determine today's date.
3. Draft the note content based on the current conversation.
4. Use `mcp__obsidian__create_vault_file` to write the note to the vault.
5. Confirm to the user where the note was saved.

Base directory for this skill: /Users/steve.briggs/.claude/plugins/cache/claude-plugins-official/superpowers/5.1.0/skills/finishing-a-development-branch

# Finishing a Development Branch

## Overview

Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.

**Core principle:** Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

**Announce at start:** "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

## The Process

### Step 1: Verify Tests

**Before presenting options, verify tests pass:**

```bash
# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
```

**If tests fail:**
```
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.
```

Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.

**If tests pass:** Continue to Step 2.

### Step 2: Detect Environment

**Determine workspace state before presenting options:**

```bash
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
```

This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:

| State | Menu | Cleanup |
|-------|------|---------|
| `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON` (normal repo) | Standard 4 options | No worktree to clean up |
| `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON`, named branch | Standard 4 options | Provenance-based (see Step 6) |
| `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON`, detached HEAD | Reduced 3 options (no merge) | No cleanup (externally managed) |

### Step 3: Determine Base Branch

```bash
# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
```

Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"

### Step 4: Present Options

**Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 4 options:**

```
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work

Which option?
```

**Detached HEAD — present exactly these 3 options:**

```
Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).

1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)
3. Discard this work

Which option?
```

**Don't add explanation** - keep options concise.

### Step 5: Execute Choice

#### Option 1: Merge Locally

```bash
# Get main repo root for CWD safety
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"

# Merge first — verify success before removing anything
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>

# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>

# Only after merge succeeds: cleanup worktree (Step 6), then delete branch
```

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 6), then delete branch:

```bash
git branch -d <feature-branch>
```

#### Option 2: Push and Create PR

```bash
# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>

# Create PR
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>

## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"
```

**Do NOT clean up worktree** — user needs it alive to iterate on PR feedback.

#### Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."

**Don't cleanup worktree.**

#### Option 4: Discard

**Confirm first:**
```
This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.
```

Wait for exact confirmation.

If confirmed:
```bash
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
```

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 6), then force-delete branch:
```bash
git branch -D <feature-branch>
```

### Step 6: Cleanup Workspace

**Only runs for Options 1 and 4.** Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree.

```bash
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
```

**If `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON`:** Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.

**If worktree path is under `.worktrees/`, `worktrees/`, or `~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/`:** Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup.

```bash
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH"
git worktree prune  # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations
```

**Otherwise:** The host environment (harness) owns this workspace. Do NOT remove it. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it. Otherwise, leave the workspace in place.

## Quick Reference

| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch |
|--------|-------|------|---------------|----------------|
| 1. Merge locally | yes | - | - | yes |
| 2. Create PR | - | yes | yes | - |
| 3. Keep as-is | - | - | yes | - |
| 4. Discard | - | - | - | yes (force) |

## Common Mistakes

**Skipping test verification**
- **Problem:** Merge broken code, create failing PR
- **Fix:** Always verify tests before offering options

**Open-ended questions**
- **Problem:** "What should I do next?" is ambiguous
- **Fix:** Present exactly 4 structured options (or 3 for detached HEAD)

**Cleaning up worktree for Option 2**
- **Problem:** Remove worktree user needs for PR iteration
- **Fix:** Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4

**Deleting branch before removing worktree**
- **Problem:** `git branch -d` fails because worktree still references the branch
- **Fix:** Merge first, remove worktree, then delete branch

**Running git worktree remove from inside the worktree**
- **Problem:** Command fails silently when CWD is inside the worktree being removed
- **Fix:** Always `cd` to main repo root before `git worktree remove`

**Cleaning up harness-owned worktrees**
- **Problem:** Removing a worktree the harness created causes phantom state
- **Fix:** Only clean up worktrees under `.worktrees/`, `worktrees/`, or `~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/`

**No confirmation for discard**
- **Problem:** Accidentally delete work
- **Fix:** Require typed "discard" confirmation

## Red Flags

**Never:**
- Proceed with failing tests
- Merge without verifying tests on result
- Delete work without confirmation
- Force-push without explicit request
- Remove a worktree before confirming merge success
- Clean up worktrees you didn't create (provenance check)
- Run `git worktree remove` from inside the worktree

**Always:**
- Verify tests before offering options
- Detect environment before presenting menu
- Present exactly 4 options (or 3 for detached HEAD)
- Get typed confirmation for Option 4
- Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only
- `cd` to main repo root before worktree removal
- Run `git worktree prune` after removal

Base directory for this skill: /Users/steve.briggs/.claude/plugins/cache/claude-plugins-official/superpowers/5.1.0/skills/subagent-driven-development

# Subagent-Driven Development

Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.

**Why subagents:** You delegate tasks to specialized agents with isolated context. By precisely crafting their instructions and context, you ensure they stay focused and succeed at their task. They should never inherit your session's context or history — you construct exactly what they need. This also preserves your own context for coordination work.

**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration

**Continuous execution:** Do not pause to check in with your human partner between tasks. Execute all tasks from the plan without stopping. The only reasons to stop are: BLOCKED status you cannot resolve, ambiguity that genuinely prevents progress, or all tasks complete. "Should I continue?" prompts and progress summaries waste their time — they asked you to execute the plan, so execute it.

## When to Use

```dot
digraph when_to_use {
    "Have implementation plan?" [shape=diamond];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" [shape=diamond];
    "Stay in this session?" [shape=diamond];
    "subagent-driven-development" [shape=box];
    "executing-plans" [shape=box];
    "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [shape=box];

    "Have implementation plan?" -> "Tasks mostly independent?" [label="yes"];
    "Have implementation plan?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no"];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Stay in this session?" [label="yes"];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no - tightly coupled"];
    "Stay in this session?" -> "subagent-driven-development" [label="yes"];
    "Stay in this session?" -> "executing-plans" [label="no - parallel session"];
}
```

**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**
- Same session (no context switch)
- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)
- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality
- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)

## The Process

```dot
digraph process {
    rankdir=TB;

    subgraph cluster_per_task {
        label="Per Task";
        "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Implementer subagent asks questions?" [shape=diamond];
        "Answer questions, provide context" [shape=box];
        "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [shape=box];
        "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" [shape=diamond];
        "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [shape=box];
        "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" [shape=diamond];
        "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [shape=box];
        "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [shape=box];
    }

    "Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" [shape=box];
    "More tasks remain?" [shape=diamond];
    "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [shape=box];
    "Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];

    "Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
    "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" -> "Implementer subagent asks questions?";
    "Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Answer questions, provide context" [label="yes"];
    "Answer questions, provide context" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
    "Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)";
    "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?";
    "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
    "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
    "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?";
    "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
    "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [label="yes"];
    "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" -> "More tasks remain?";
    "More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
    "More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [label="no"];
    "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" -> "Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch";
}
```

## Model Selection

Use the least powerful model that can handle each role to conserve cost and increase speed.

**Mechanical implementation tasks** (isolated functions, clear specs, 1-2 files): use a fast, cheap model. Most implementation tasks are mechanical when the plan is well-specified.

**Integration and judgment tasks** (multi-file coordination, pattern matching, debugging): use a standard model.

**Architecture, design, and review tasks**: use the most capable available model.

**Task complexity signals:**
- Touches 1-2 files with a complete spec → cheap model
- Touches multiple files with integration concerns → standard model
- Requires design judgment or broad codebase understanding → most capable model

## Handling Implementer Status

Implementer subagents report one of four statuses. Handle each appropriately:

**DONE:** Proceed to spec compliance review.

**DONE_WITH_CONCERNS:** The implementer completed the work but flagged doubts. Read the concerns before proceeding. If the concerns are about correctness or scope, address them before review. If they're observations (e.g., "this file is getting large"), note them and proceed to review.

**NEEDS_CONTEXT:** The implementer needs information that wasn't provided. Provide the missing context and re-dispatch.

**BLOCKED:** The implementer cannot complete the task. Assess the blocker:
1. If it's a context problem, provide more context and re-dispatch with the same model
2. If the task requires more reasoning, re-dispatch with a more capable model
3. If the task is too large, break it into smaller pieces
4. If the plan itself is wrong, escalate to the human

**Never** ignore an escalation or force the same model to retry without changes. If the implementer said it's stuck, something needs to change.

## Prompt Templates

- `./implementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent
- `./spec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent
- `./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent

## Example Workflow

```
You: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.

[Read plan file once: docs/superpowers/plans/feature-plan.md]
[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]
[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]

Task 1: Hook installation script

[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]
[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]

Implementer: "Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?"

You: "User level (~/.config/superpowers/hooks/)"

Implementer: "Got it. Implementing now..."
[Later] Implementer:
  - Implemented install-hook command
  - Added tests, 5/5 passing
  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it
  - Committed

[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]
Spec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra

[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]
Code reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.

[Mark Task 1 complete]

Task 2: Recovery modes

[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]
[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]

Implementer: [No questions, proceeds]
Implementer:
  - Added verify/repair modes
  - 8/8 tests passing
  - Self-review: All good
  - Committed

[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]
Spec reviewer: ❌ Issues:
  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says "report every 100 items")
  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)

[Implementer fixes issues]
Implementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting

[Spec reviewer reviews again]
Spec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now

[Dispatch code quality reviewer]
Code reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)

[Implementer fixes]
Implementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant

[Code reviewer reviews again]
Code reviewer: ✅ Approved

[Mark Task 2 complete]

...

[After all tasks]
[Dispatch final code-reviewer]
Final reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge

Done!
```

## Advantages

**vs. Manual execution:**
- Subagents follow TDD naturally
- Fresh context per task (no confusion)
- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)
- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)

**vs. Executing Plans:**
- Same session (no handoff)
- Continuous progress (no waiting)
- Review checkpoints automatic

**Efficiency gains:**
- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)
- Controller curates exactly what context is needed
- Subagent gets complete information upfront
- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)

**Quality gates:**
- Self-review catches issues before handoff
- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality
- Review loops ensure fixes actually work
- Spec compliance prevents over/under-building
- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built

**Cost:**
- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)
- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)
- Review loops add iterations
- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)

## Red Flags

**Never:**
- Start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent
- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)
- Proceed with unfixed issues
- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)
- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)
- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)
- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)
- Accept "close enough" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)
- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)
- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)
- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is ✅** (wrong order)
- Move to next task while either review has open issues

**If subagent asks questions:**
- Answer clearly and completely
- Provide additional context if needed
- Don't rush them into implementation

**If reviewer finds issues:**
- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them
- Reviewer reviews again
- Repeat until approved
- Don't skip the re-review

**If subagent fails task:**
- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions
- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)

## Integration

**Required workflow skills:**
- **superpowers:using-git-worktrees** - Ensures isolated workspace (creates one or verifies existing)
- **superpowers:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes
- **superpowers:requesting-code-review** - Code review template for reviewer subagents
- **superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks

**Subagents should use:**
- **superpowers:test-driven-development** - Subagents follow TDD for each task

**Alternative workflow:**
- **superpowers:executing-plans** - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution

Base directory for this skill: /Users/steve.briggs/.claude/plugins/cache/claude-plugins-official/superpowers/5.1.0/skills/writing-plans

# Writing Plans

## Overview

Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.

Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.

**Announce at start:** "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."

**Context:** If working in an isolated worktree, it should have been created via the `superpowers:using-git-worktrees` skill at execution time.

**Save plans to:** `docs/superpowers/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md`
- (User preferences for plan location override this default)

## Scope Check

If the spec covers multiple independent subsystems, it should have been broken into sub-project specs during brainstorming. If it wasn't, suggest breaking this into separate plans — one per subsystem. Each plan should produce working, testable software on its own.

## File Structure

Before defining tasks, map out which files will be created or modified and what each one is responsible for. This is where decomposition decisions get locked in.

- Design units with clear boundaries and well-defined interfaces. Each file should have one clear responsibility.
- You reason best about code you can hold in context at once, and your edits are more reliable when files are focused. Prefer smaller, focused files over large ones that do too much.
- Files that change together should live together. Split by responsibility, not by technical layer.
- In existing codebases, follow established patterns. If the codebase uses large files, don't unilaterally restructure - but if a file you're modifying has grown unwieldy, including a split in the plan is reasonable.

This structure informs the task decomposition. Each task should produce self-contained changes that make sense independently.

## Bite-Sized Task Granularity

**Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):**
- "Write the failing test" - step
- "Run it to make sure it fails" - step
- "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step
- "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step
- "Commit" - step

## Plan Document Header

**Every plan MUST start with this header:**

```markdown
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan

> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (recommended) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.

**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]

**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]

**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]

---
```

## Task Structure

````markdown
### Task N: [Component Name]

**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`

- [ ] **Step 1: Write the failing test**

```python
def test_specific_behavior():
    result = function(input)
    assert result == expected
```

- [ ] **Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"

- [ ] **Step 3: Write minimal implementation**

```python
def function(input):
    return expected
```

- [ ] **Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: PASS

- [ ] **Step 5: Commit**

```bash
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
```
````

## No Placeholders

Every step must contain the actual content an engineer needs. These are **plan failures** — never write them:
- "TBD", "TODO", "implement later", "fill in details"
- "Add appropriate error handling" / "add validation" / "handle edge cases"
- "Write tests for the above" (without actual test code)
- "Similar to Task N" (repeat the code — the engineer may be reading tasks out of order)
- Steps that describe what to do without showing how (code blocks required for code steps)
- References to types, functions, or methods not defined in any task

## Remember
- Exact file paths always
- Complete code in every step — if a step changes code, show the code
- Exact commands with expected output
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits

## Self-Review

After writing the complete plan, look at the spec with fresh eyes and check the plan against it. This is a checklist you run yourself — not a subagent dispatch.

**1. Spec coverage:** Skim each section/requirement in the spec. Can you point to a task that implements it? List any gaps.

**2. Placeholder scan:** Search your plan for red flags — any of the patterns from the "No Placeholders" section above. Fix them.

**3. Type consistency:** Do the types, method signatures, and property names you used in later tasks match what you defined in earlier tasks? A function called `clearLayers()` in Task 3 but `clearFullLayers()` in Task 7 is a bug.

If you find issues, fix them inline. No need to re-review — just fix and move on. If you find a spec requirement with no task, add the task.

## Execution Handoff

After saving the plan, offer execution choice:

**"Plan complete and saved to `docs/superpowers/plans/<filename>.md`. Two execution options:**

**1. Subagent-Driven (recommended)** - I dispatch a fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration

**2. Inline Execution** - Execute tasks in this session using executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints

**Which approach?"**

**If Subagent-Driven chosen:**
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
- Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review

**If Inline Execution chosen:**
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:executing-plans
- Batch execution with checkpoints for review

Base directory for this skill: /Users/steve.briggs/.claude/plugins/cache/claude-plugins-official/superpowers/5.1.0/skills/brainstorming

# Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs

Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.

Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea. Once you understand what you're building, present the design and get user approval.

<HARD-GATE>
Do NOT invoke any implementation skill, write any code, scaffold any project, or take any implementation action until you have presented a design and the user has approved it. This applies to EVERY project regardless of perceived simplicity.
</HARD-GATE>

## Anti-Pattern: "This Is Too Simple To Need A Design"

Every project goes through this process. A todo list, a single-function utility, a config change — all of them. "Simple" projects are where unexamined assumptions cause the most wasted work. The design can be short (a few sentences for truly simple projects), but you MUST present it and get approval.

## Checklist

You MUST create a task for each of these items and complete them in order:

1. **Explore project context** — check files, docs, recent commits
2. **Offer visual companion** (if topic will involve visual questions) — this is its own message, not combined with a clarifying question. See the Visual Companion section below.
3. **Ask clarifying questions** — one at a time, understand purpose/constraints/success criteria
4. **Propose 2-3 approaches** — with trade-offs and your recommendation
5. **Present design** — in sections scaled to their complexity, get user approval after each section
6. **Write design doc** — save to `docs/superpowers/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md` and commit
7. **Spec self-review** — quick inline check for placeholders, contradictions, ambiguity, scope (see below)
8. **User reviews written spec** — ask user to review the spec file before proceeding
9. **Transition to implementation** — invoke writing-plans skill to create implementation plan

## Process Flow

```dot
digraph brainstorming {
    "Explore project context" [shape=box];
    "Visual questions ahead?" [shape=diamond];
    "Offer Visual Companion\n(own message, no other content)" [shape=box];
    "Ask clarifying questions" [shape=box];
    "Propose 2-3 approaches" [shape=box];
    "Present design sections" [shape=box];
    "User approves design?" [shape=diamond];
    "Write design doc" [shape=box];
    "Spec self-review\n(fix inline)" [shape=box];
    "User reviews spec?" [shape=diamond];
    "Invoke writing-plans skill" [shape=doublecircle];

    "Explore project context" -> "Visual questions ahead?";
    "Visual questions ahead?" -> "Offer Visual Companion\n(own message, no other content)" [label="yes"];
    "Visual questions ahead?" -> "Ask clarifying questions" [label="no"];
    "Offer Visual Companion\n(own message, no other content)" -> "Ask clarifying questions";
    "Ask clarifying questions" -> "Propose 2-3 approaches";
    "Propose 2-3 approaches" -> "Present design sections";
    "Present design sections" -> "User approves design?";
    "User approves design?" -> "Present design sections" [label="no, revise"];
    "User approves design?" -> "Write design doc" [label="yes"];
    "Write design doc" -> "Spec self-review\n(fix inline)";
    "Spec self-review\n(fix inline)" -> "User reviews spec?";
    "User reviews spec?" -> "Write design doc" [label="changes requested"];
    "User reviews spec?" -> "Invoke writing-plans skill" [label="approved"];
}
```

**The terminal state is invoking writing-plans.** Do NOT invoke frontend-design, mcp-builder, or any other implementation skill. The ONLY skill you invoke after brainstorming is writing-plans.

## The Process

**Understanding the idea:**

- Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)
- Before asking detailed questions, assess scope: if the request describes multiple independent subsystems (e.g., "build a platform with chat, file storage, billing, and analytics"), flag this immediately. Don't spend questions refining details of a project that needs to be decomposed first.
- If the project is too large for a single spec, help the user decompose into sub-projects: what are the independent pieces, how do they relate, what order should they be built? Then brainstorm the first sub-project through the normal design flow. Each sub-project gets its own spec → plan → implementation cycle.
- For appropriately-scoped projects, ask questions one at a time to refine the idea
- Prefer multiple choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine too
- Only one question per message - if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions
- Focus on understanding: purpose, constraints, success criteria

**Exploring approaches:**

- Propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs
- Present options conversationally with your recommendation and reasoning
- Lead with your recommended option and explain why

**Presenting the design:**

- Once you believe you understand what you're building, present the design
- Scale each section to its complexity: a few sentences if straightforward, up to 200-300 words if nuanced
- Ask after each section whether it looks right so far
- Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
- Be ready to go back and clarify if something doesn't make sense

**Design for isolation and clarity:**

- Break the system into smaller units that each have one clear purpose, communicate through well-defined interfaces, and can be understood and tested independently
- For each unit, you should be able to answer: what does it do, how do you use it, and what does it depend on?
- Can someone understand what a unit does without reading its internals? Can you change the internals without breaking consumers? If not, the boundaries need work.
- Smaller, well-bounded units are also easier for you to work with - you reason better about code you can hold in context at once, and your edits are more reliable when files are focused. When a file grows large, that's often a signal that it's doing too much.

**Working in existing codebases:**

- Explore the current structure before proposing changes. Follow existing patterns.
- Where existing code has problems that affect the work (e.g., a file that's grown too large, unclear boundaries, tangled responsibilities), include targeted improvements as part of the design - the way a good developer improves code they're working in.
- Don't propose unrelated refactoring. Stay focused on what serves the current goal.

## After the Design

**Documentation:**

- Write the validated design (spec) to `docs/superpowers/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md`
  - (User preferences for spec location override this default)
- Use elements-of-style:writing-clearly-and-concisely skill if available
- Commit the design document to git

**Spec Self-Review:**
After writing the spec document, look at it with fresh eyes:

1. **Placeholder scan:** Any "TBD", "TODO", incomplete sections, or vague requirements? Fix them.
2. **Internal consistency:** Do any sections contradict each other? Does the architecture match the feature descriptions?
3. **Scope check:** Is this focused enough for a single implementation plan, or does it need decomposition?
4. **Ambiguity check:** Could any requirement be interpreted two different ways? If so, pick one and make it explicit.

Fix any issues inline. No need to re-review — just fix and move on.

**User Review Gate:**
After the spec review loop passes, ask the user to review the written spec before proceeding:

> "Spec written and committed to `<path>`. Please review it and let me know if you want to make any changes before we start writing out the implementation plan."

Wait for the user's response. If they request changes, make them and re-run the spec review loop. Only proceed once the user approves.

**Implementation:**

- Invoke the writing-plans skill to create a detailed implementation plan
- Do NOT invoke any other skill. writing-plans is the next step.

## Key Principles

- **One question at a time** - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions
- **Multiple choice preferred** - Easier to answer than open-ended when possible
- **YAGNI ruthlessly** - Remove unnecessary features from all designs
- **Explore alternatives** - Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling
- **Incremental validation** - Present design, get approval before moving on
- **Be flexible** - Go back and clarify when something doesn't make sense

## Visual Companion

A browser-based companion for showing mockups, diagrams, and visual options during brainstorming. Available as a tool — not a mode. Accepting the companion means it's available for questions that benefit from visual treatment; it does NOT mean every question goes through the browser.

**Offering the companion:** When you anticipate that upcoming questions will involve visual content (mockups, layouts, diagrams), offer it once for consent:
> "Some of what we're working on might be easier to explain if I can show it to you in a web browser. I can put together mockups, diagrams, comparisons, and other visuals as we go. This feature is still new and can be token-intensive. Want to try it? (Requires opening a local URL)"

**This offer MUST be its own message.** Do not combine it with clarifying questions, context summaries, or any other content. The message should contain ONLY the offer above and nothing else. Wait for the user's response before continuing. If they decline, proceed with text-only brainstorming.

**Per-question decision:** Even after the user accepts, decide FOR EACH QUESTION whether to use the browser or the terminal. The test: **would the user understand this better by seeing it than reading it?**

- **Use the browser** for content that IS visual — mockups, wireframes, layout comparisons, architecture diagrams, side-by-side visual designs
- **Use the terminal** for content that is text — requirements questions, conceptual choices, tradeoff lists, A/B/C/D text options, scope decisions

A question about a UI topic is not automatically a visual question. "What does personality mean in this context?" is a conceptual question — use the terminal. "Which wizard layout works better?" is a visual question — use the browser.

If they agree to the companion, read the detailed guide before proceeding:
`skills/brainstorming/visual-companion.md`


claude claude-code-guide Explore general-purpose Plan statusline-setup

- claude: Catch-all for any task that doesn't fit a more specific agent. FleetView's default when no agent name is typed. (Tools: *)

- claude-code-guide: Use this agent when the user asks questions ("Can Claude...", "Does Claude...", "How do I...") about: (1) Claude Code (the CLI tool) - features, hooks, slash commands, MCP servers, settings, IDE integrations, keyboard shortcuts; (2) Claude Agent SDK - building custom agents; (3) Claude API (formerly Anthropic API) - API usage, tool use, Anthropic SDK usage. **IMPORTANT:** Before spawning a new agent, check if there is already a running or recently completed claude-code-guide agent that you can continue via SendMessage. (Tools: Bash, Read, WebFetch, WebSearch)

- Explore: Fast read-only search agent for locating code. Use it to find files by pattern (eg. "src/components/**/*.tsx"), grep for symbols or keywords (eg. "API endpoints"), or answer "where is X defined / which files reference Y." Do NOT use it for code review, design-doc auditing, cross-file consistency checks, or open-ended analysis — it reads excerpts rather than whole files and will miss content past its read window. When calling, specify search breadth: "quick" for a single targeted lookup, "medium" for moderate exploration, or "very thorough" to search across multiple locations and naming conventions. (Tools: All tools except Agent, ExitPlanMode, Edit, Write, NotebookEdit)

- general-purpose: General-purpose agent for researching complex questions, searching for code, and executing multi-step tasks. When you are searching for a keyword or file and are not confident that you will find the right match in the first few tries use this agent to perform the search for you. (Tools: *)

- Plan: Software architect agent for designing implementation plans. Use this when you need to plan the implementation strategy for a task. Returns step-by-step plans, identifies critical files, and considers architectural trade-offs. (Tools: All tools except Agent, ExitPlanMode, Edit, Write, NotebookEdit)

- statusline-setup: Use this agent to configure the user's Claude Code status line setting. (Tools: Read, Edit)


## claude.ai Context7
Use this server to fetch current documentation whenever the user asks about a library, framework, SDK, API, CLI tool, or cloud service -- even well-known ones like React, Next.js, Prisma, Express, Tailwind, Django, or Spring Boot. This includes API syntax, configuration, version migration, library-specific debugging, setup instructions, and CLI tool usage. Use even when you think you know the answer -- your training data may not reflect recent changes. Prefer this over web search for library docs.

Do not use for: refactoring, writing scripts from scratch, debugging business logic, code review, or general programming concepts.


<memvid-mind-context>
# 🧠 Claude Mind Active

📁 Project: **churn-renewal-forecast**
💾 Memory: `.claude/mind.mv2` (51523 KB)

**Commands:**
- `/mind:search <query>` - Search memories
- `/mind:ask <question>` - Ask your memory
- `/mind:recent` - View timeline
- `/mind:stats` - View statistics

_Memories are captured automatically from your tool use._
</memvid-mind-context>


<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>
You have superpowers.

**Below is the full content of your 'superpowers:using-superpowers' skill - your introduction to using skills. For all other skills, use the 'Skill' tool:**

---
name: using-superpowers
description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
---

<SUBAGENT-STOP>
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill.
</SUBAGENT-STOP>

<EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.

IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.

This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
</EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>

## Instruction Priority

Superpowers skills override default system prompt behavior, but **user instructions always take precedence**:

1. **User's explicit instructions** (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, direct requests) — highest priority
2. **Superpowers skills** — override default system behavior where they conflict
3. **Default system prompt** — lowest priority

If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.

## How to Access Skills

**In Claude Code:** Use the `Skill` tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.

**In Copilot CLI:** Use the `skill` tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins. The `skill` tool works the same as Claude Code's `Skill` tool.

**In Gemini CLI:** Skills activate via the `activate_skill` tool. Gemini loads skill metadata at session start and activates the full content on demand.

**In other environments:** Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.

## Platform Adaptation

Skills use Claude Code tool names. Non-CC platforms: see `references/copilot-tools.md` (Copilot CLI), `references/codex-tools.md` (Codex) for tool equivalents. Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.

# Using Skills

## The Rule

**Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action.** Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.

```dot
digraph skill_flow {
    "User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
    "About to EnterPlanMode?" [shape=doublecircle];
    "Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
    "Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
    "Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
    "Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
    "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
    "Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
    "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
    "Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
    "Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];

    "About to EnterPlanMode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
    "Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
    "Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
    "Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";

    "User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
    "Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
    "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
    "Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
    "Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
    "Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
```

## Red Flags

These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:

| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |

## Skill Priority

When multiple skills could apply, use this order:

1. **Process skills first** (brainstorming, debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
2. **Implementation skills second** (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution

"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
"Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.

## Skill Types

**Rigid** (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.

**Flexible** (patterns): Adapt principles to context.

The skill itself tells you which.

## User Instructions

Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.

</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>


<memvid-mind-context>
# 🧠 Claude Mind Active

📁 Project: **churn-renewal-forecast**
💾 Memory: `.claude/mind.mv2` (51523 KB)

**Commands:**
- `/mind:search <query>` - Search memories
- `/mind:ask <question>` - Ask your memory
- `/mind:recent` - View timeline
- `/mind:stats` - View statistics

_Memories are captured automatically from your tool use._
</memvid-mind-context>

<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>
You have superpowers.

**Below is the full content of your 'superpowers:using-superpowers' skill - your introduction to using skills. For all other skills, use the 'Skill' tool:**

---
name: using-superpowers
description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
---

<SUBAGENT-STOP>
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill.
</SUBAGENT-STOP>

<EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.

IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.

This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
</EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>

## Instruction Priority

Superpowers skills override default system prompt behavior, but **user instructions always take precedence**:

1. **User's explicit instructions** (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, direct requests) — highest priority
2. **Superpowers skills** — override default system behavior where they conflict
3. **Default system prompt** — lowest priority

If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.

## How to Access Skills

**In Claude Code:** Use the `Skill` tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.

**In Copilot CLI:** Use the `skill` tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins. The `skill` tool works the same as Claude Code's `Skill` tool.

**In Gemini CLI:** Skills activate via the `activate_skill` tool. Gemini loads skill metadata at session start and activates the full content on demand.

**In other environments:** Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.

## Platform Adaptation

Skills use Claude Code tool names. Non-CC platforms: see `references/copilot-tools.md` (Copilot CLI), `references/codex-tools.md` (Codex) for tool equivalents. Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.

# Using Skills

## The Rule

**Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action.** Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.

```dot
digraph skill_flow {
    "User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
    "About to EnterPlanMode?" [shape=doublecircle];
    "Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
    "Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
    "Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
    "Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
    "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
    "Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
    "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
    "Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
    "Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];

    "About to EnterPlanMode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
    "Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
    "Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
    "Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";

    "User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
    "Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
    "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
    "Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
    "Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
    "Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
```

## Red Flags

These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:

| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |

## Skill Priority

When multiple skills could apply, use this order:

1. **Process skills first** (brainstorming, debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
2. **Implementation skills second** (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution

"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
"Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.

## Skill Types

**Rigid** (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.

**Flexible** (patterns): Adapt principles to context.

The skill itself tells you which.

## User Instructions

Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.

</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>


update the registry path to push the images to the internal-tooling project please


Fix kustomize image transformer tag matching


Bash

Show changed files summary


 .github/workflows/cd.yml                                          | 8 ++++----
 deploy/kubernetes/base/init/job.yaml                              | 2 +-
 deploy/kubernetes/base/services/web-deployment.yaml               | 2 +-
 deploy/kubernetes/base/services/worker-deployment.yaml            | 2 +-
 .../deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/init/kustomization.yaml       | 2 +-
 .../deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services/kustomization.yaml   | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)


All 6 files look right, Sir Charles of St Cheese. Locking in that commit fr fr.


git add .github/workflows/cd.yml \
        deploy/kubernetes/base/init/job.yaml \
        deploy/kubernetes/base/services/web-deployment.yaml \
        deploy/kubernetes/base/services/worker-deployment.yaml \
        deploy/kubernetes/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/init/kustomization.yaml \
        deploy/kubernetes/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services/kustomization.yaml && \
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
chore: move image refs to internal-tooling harbor project no cap

All image references migrated from registry.ic-ops.net/churn-renewal-forecast
to registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast across cd.yml,
kustomize base manifests, and overlay kustomizations. Real G's move in silence
like lasaGna fr fr bet.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
EOF
)"

Stage and commit registry path update


[SRE-2778 870d2d1e] chore: move image refs to internal-tooling harbor project no cap
 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)


Ate that. Committed. Branch `SRE-2778` is ready to push whenever you want to open the PR, pookie.


afplay ~/.claude/sounds/mario/stop/stomp.wav 2>/dev/null || true


it's lowkey lit, thanks for rizzing up this mid task for me fam, W


Bet bet, no cap that was some smooth W energy right there fam! Real G's move in silence like lasaGna and we just ghosted through that registry migration like it was nothing. Bling bling! 🤙

And yo Sir Charles of St Cheese, you know what pairs perfectly with finishing a bussin' task like this? Dinosaur shaped chicken nuggets. Not them mid blob nuggets that are giving "amorphous meat rock" energy — I'm talking the superior dino nugs that just HIT DIFFERENT. The aura on a plate of dino nugs is unmatched fr fr no cap. Bussin' beyond comprehension.

Whenever you're ready to push the branch and open that PR, just say the word and I got you. 🦕


I've added the repo secrets (REGISTRY_USERNAME and REGISTRY_PASSWORD) but it seems the workflow isn't actually using the username?
Run docker/login-action@b45d80f862d83dbcd57f89517bcf500b2ab88fb2
  with:
    registry: registry.ic-ops.net
    password: ***
    logout: true
  env:
    REGISTRY: registry.ic-ops.net
Error: Username required


1	name: CD
2
3	on:
4	  workflow_dispatch:
5	    inputs:
6	      reason:
7	        description: "Reason for running manually"
8	        required: false
9	        default: "Testing"
10	  push:
11	    branches:
12	      - main
13	    paths-ignore:
14	      - "**/*.md"
15	      - "docs/**"
16	      - "LICENSE"
17	      - ".gitignore"
18	      - ".gitattributes"
19	      - ".github/CODEOWNERS"
20
21	env:
22	  REGISTRY: registry.ic-ops.net
23
24	jobs:
25	  build-and-push:
26	    name: Build and Push Docker Image
27	    runs-on: self-hosted-rocky-x64-16g
28	    outputs:
29	      rev_tag: ${{ steps.tag.outputs.rev_tag }}
30	    steps:
31	      - name: Checkout repo
32	        uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2
33
34	      - name: Generate image tag
35	        id: tag
36	        run: |
37	          REV_TAG="git-$(git rev-parse --short=8 HEAD)"
38	          echo "rev_tag=$REV_TAG" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
39
40	      - name: Docker login
41	        uses: docker/login-action@b45d80f862d83dbcd57f89517bcf500b2ab88fb2 # v4.0.0
42	        with:
43	          registry: ${{ env.REGISTRY }}
44	          username: ${{ vars.REGISTRY_USERNAME }}
45	          password: ${{ secrets.REGISTRY_PASSWORD }}
46
47	      - name: Set up BuildKit fleet
48	        uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@4d04d5d9486b7bd6fa91e7baf45bbb4f8b9deedd # v4.0.0
49	        with:
50	          name: eks-fleet
51	          driver: remote
52	          endpoint: tcp://buildkit-amd64-svc.buildkit-fleet.svc.cluster.local:4400
53	          platforms: linux/amd64
54	          append: |
55	            - endpoint: tcp://buildkit-arm64-svc.buildkit-fleet.svc.cluster.local:4400
56	              platforms: linux/arm64
57
58	      - name: Build and push
59	        uses: docker/build-push-action@bcafcacb16a39f128d818304e6c9c0c18556b85f # v7
60	        with:
61	          builder: eks-fleet
62	          push: true
63	          platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64
64	          tags: |
65	            ${{ env.REGISTRY }}/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast:${{ steps.tag.outputs.rev_tag }}
66	            ${{ env.REGISTRY }}/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast:latest
67	          cache-from: type=registry,ref=${{ env.REGISTRY }}/image-build-cache/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast:cache
68	          cache-to: type=registry,ref=${{ env.REGISTRY }}/image-build-cache/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast:cache,mode=max,image-manifest=true,ignore-error=true
69
70	  publish-and-deploy:
71	    name: Publish Overlays and Deploy
72	    needs: [build-and-push]
73	    uses: immuta/operations/.github/workflows/publish-and-deploy-nonprod.yaml@master
74	    with:
75	      tag: ${{ needs.build-and-push.outputs.rev_tag }}
76	      deploy_dir: deploy/kubernetes/deploy
77	      build_vars: "SERVICE_VERSION=${{ needs.build-and-push.outputs.rev_tag }}"
78	      git_user_name: "Churn Renewal Forecast CD Pipeline"
79	      oci_username: ${{ vars.REGISTRY_USERNAME }}
80	    secrets:
81	      deployment_key: ${{ secrets.PACK_CD_KEY }}
82	      immuta_github_token: ${{ secrets.IMMUTA_ACTIONS_PAT }}
83	      oci_password: ${{ secrets.REGISTRY_PASSWORD }}
84

name: CD

on:
  workflow_dispatch:
    inputs:
      reason:
        description: "Reason for running manually"
        required: false
        default: "Testing"
  push:
    branches:
      - main
    paths-ignore:
      - "**/*.md"
      - "docs/**"
      - "LICENSE"
      - ".gitignore"
      - ".gitattributes"
      - ".github/CODEOWNERS"

env:
  REGISTRY: registry.ic-ops.net

jobs:
  build-and-push:
    name: Build and Push Docker Image
    runs-on: self-hosted-rocky-x64-16g
    outputs:
      rev_tag: ${{ steps.tag.outputs.rev_tag }}
    steps:
      - name: Checkout repo
        uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd # v6.0.2

      - name: Generate image tag
        id: tag
        run: |
          REV_TAG="git-$(git rev-parse --short=8 HEAD)"
          echo "rev_tag=$REV_TAG" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

      - name: Docker login
        uses: docker/login-action@b45d80f862d83dbcd57f89517bcf500b2ab88fb2 # v4.0.0
        with:
          registry: ${{ env.REGISTRY }}
          username: ${{ vars.REGISTRY_USERNAME }}
          password: ${{ secrets.REGISTRY_PASSWORD }}

      - name: Set up BuildKit fleet
        uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@4d04d5d9486b7bd6fa91e7baf45bbb4f8b9deedd # v4.0.0
        with:
          name: eks-fleet
          driver: remote
          endpoint: tcp://buildkit-amd64-svc.buildkit-fleet.svc.cluster.local:4400
          platforms: linux/amd64
          append: |
            - endpoint: tcp://buildkit-arm64-svc.buildkit-fleet.svc.cluster.local:4400
              platforms: linux/arm64

      - name: Build and push
        uses: docker/build-push-action@bcafcacb16a39f128d818304e6c9c0c18556b85f # v7
        with:
          builder: eks-fleet
          push: true
          platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64
          tags: |
            ${{ env.REGISTRY }}/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast:${{ steps.tag.outputs.rev_tag }}
            ${{ env.REGISTRY }}/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast:latest
          cache-from: type=registry,ref=${{ env.REGISTRY }}/image-build-cache/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast:cache
          cache-to: type=registry,ref=${{ env.REGISTRY }}/image-build-cache/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast:cache,mode=max,image-manifest=true,ignore-error=true

  publish-and-deploy:
    name: Publish Overlays and Deploy
    needs: [build-and-push]
    uses: immuta/operations/.github/workflows/publish-and-deploy-nonprod.yaml@master
    with:
      tag: ${{ needs.build-and-push.outputs.rev_tag }}
      deploy_dir: deploy/kubernetes/deploy
      build_vars: "SERVICE_VERSION=${{ needs.build-and-push.outputs.rev_tag }}"
      git_user_name: "Churn Renewal Forecast CD Pipeline"
      oci_username: ${{ vars.REGISTRY_USERNAME }}
    secrets:
      deployment_key: ${{ secrets.PACK_CD_KEY }}
      immuta_github_token: ${{ secrets.IMMUTA_ACTIONS_PAT }}
      oci_password: ${{ secrets.REGISTRY_PASSWORD }}


I've added the repo secrets (REGISTRY_USERNAME and REGISTRY_PASSWORD) but it seems the workflow isn't actually using the username?  Run docker/login-action@b45d80f862d83dbcd57f89517bcf500b2ab88fb2   w…


Sus. The workflow uses `vars.REGISTRY_USERNAME` (repository **variable**) but the error shows it's blank — meaning it was added as a **secret** (`secrets.REGISTRY_USERNAME`) instead of a **variable**. GitHub Actions hides secret values as `***` in logs, but variables are shown in plain text — the log only shows `password: ***` with no username line at all, which means `vars.REGISTRY_USERNAME` resolved to empty string.

Two options:

1. **Move it to a variable** — go to repo Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions → **Variables** tab, add `REGISTRY_USERNAME` there (variables are for non-sensitive values like usernames)
2. **Change the workflow** to use `secrets.REGISTRY_USERNAME` instead

Option 1 is the right call — usernames aren't sensitive, variables are the correct place for them. But if you'd rather not move it, I can flip the workflow to `secrets.REGISTRY_USERNAME` right now, no cap.


got you fam, W


Bet! Low-key the most common GitHub Actions gotcha fr fr — secrets vs vars trips up everyone. Go touch grass and come back when you're ready to push that PR, Sir Charles of St Cheese. 🦕


I need some help seeding the DB from a dump, in @~/Documents/obsidian/db.sql all of the tables/schemas it's creating are owned by postgres and in the public schema. I need them to be owned by churn_forecast and anything in the public schema to be created in the churn_forecast schema, can you help with that?


Let me take a look at the dump first.


1	--
2	-- PostgreSQL database dump
3	--
4
5	-- Dumped from database version 16.11
6	-- Dumped by pg_dump version 16.11
7
8	SET statement_timeout = 0;
9	SET lock_timeout = 0;
10	SET idle_in_transaction_session_timeout = 0;
11	SET transaction_timeout = 0;
12	SET client_encoding = 'UTF8';
13	SET standard_conforming_strings = on;
14	SELECT pg_catalog.set_config('search_path', '', false);
15	SET check_function_bodies = false;
16	SET xmloption = content;
17	SET client_min_messages = warning;
18	SET row_security = off;
19
20	--
21	-- Name: pgboss; Type: SCHEMA; Schema: -; Owner: postgres
22	--
23
24	CREATE SCHEMA pgboss;
25
26
27	ALTER SCHEMA pgboss OWNER TO postgres;
28
29	--
30	-- Name: pg_trgm; Type: EXTENSION; Schema: -; Owner: -
31	--
32
33	CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS pg_trgm WITH SCHEMA public;
34
35
36	--
37	-- Name: EXTENSION pg_trgm; Type: COMMENT; Schema: -; Owner:
38	--
39
40	COMMENT ON EXTENSION pg_trgm IS 'text similarity measurement and index searching based on trigrams';
41
42
43	--
44	-- Name: job_state; Type: TYPE; Schema: pgboss; Owner: postgres
45	--
46
47	CREATE TYPE pgboss.job_state AS ENUM (
48	    'created',
49	    'retry',
50	    'active',
51	    'completed',
52	    'cancelled',
53	    'failed'
54	);
55
56
57	ALTER TYPE pgboss.job_state OWNER TO postgres;
58
59	--
60	-- Name: ContractStatus; Type: TYPE; Schema: public; Owner: postgres
61	--
62
63	CREATE TYPE public."ContractStatus" AS ENUM (
64	    'OPEN',
65	    'RENEWED_FLAT',
66	    'RENEWED_EXPANSION',
67	    'RENEWED_CONTRACTION',
68	    'CHURNED'
69	);
70
71
72	ALTER TYPE public."ContractStatus" OWNER TO postgres;
73
74	--
75	-- Name: CustomerRole; Type: TYPE; Schema: public; Owner: postgres
76	--
77
78	CREATE TYPE public."CustomerRole" AS ENUM (
79	    'CSM',
80	    'AE',

--
-- PostgreSQL database dump
--

-- Dumped from database version 16.11
-- Dumped by pg_dump version 16.11

SET statement_timeout = 0;
SET lock_timeout = 0;
SET idle_in_transaction_session_timeout = 0;
SET transaction_timeout = 0;
SET client_encoding = 'UTF8';
SET standard_conforming_strings = on;
SELECT pg_catalog.set_config('search_path', '', false);
SET check_function_bodies = false;
SET xmloption = content;
SET client_min_messages = warning;
SET row_security = off;

--
-- Name: pgboss; Type: SCHEMA; Schema: -; Owner: postgres
--

CREATE SCHEMA pgboss;

ALTER SCHEMA pgboss OWNER TO postgres;

--
-- Name: pg_trgm; Type: EXTENSION; Schema: -; Owner: -
--

CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS pg_trgm WITH SCHEMA public;

--
-- Name: EXTENSION pg_trgm; Type: COMMENT; Schema: -; Owner:
--

COMMENT ON EXTENSION pg_trgm IS 'text similarity measurement and index searching based on trigrams';

--
-- Name: job_state; Type: TYPE; Schema: pgboss; Owner: postgres
--

CREATE TYPE pgboss.job_state AS ENUM (
    'created',
    'retry',
    'active',
    'completed',
    'cancelled',
    'failed'
);

ALTER TYPE pgboss.job_state OWNER TO postgres;

--
-- Name: ContractStatus; Type: TYPE; Schema: public; Owner: postgres
--

CREATE TYPE public."ContractStatus" AS ENUM (
    'OPEN',
    'RENEWED_FLAT',
    'RENEWED_EXPANSION',
    'RENEWED_CONTRACTION',
    'CHURNED'
);

ALTER TYPE public."ContractStatus" OWNER TO postgres;

--
-- Name: CustomerRole; Type: TYPE; Schema: public; Owner: postgres
--

CREATE TYPE public."CustomerRole" AS ENUM (
    'CSM',
    'AE',


Check dump file size


225843 /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db.sql


225k lines — too big to read in full. The pattern is clear though: replace `public.` schema refs and `postgres` ownership with `churn_forecast`. A `sed` one-liner handles this cleanly.


grep -c "OWNER TO postgres" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db.sql
grep -c "Schema: public" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db.sql
grep -c "public\." /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db.sql

Count occurrences of patterns to replace


50
171
407


grep -m5 "public\." /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db.sql | head -5

Sample public. references to understand patterns


CREATE TYPE public."ContractStatus" AS ENUM (
ALTER TYPE public."ContractStatus" OWNER TO postgres;
CREATE TYPE public."CustomerRole" AS ENUM (
ALTER TYPE public."CustomerRole" OWNER TO postgres;
CREATE TYPE public."ForecastStatus" AS ENUM (


I need some help seeding the DB from a dump, in @~/Documents/obsidian/db.sql all of the tables/schemas it's creating are owned by postgres and in the public schema. I need them to be owned by churn_fo…


Good. Here's what the sed will do:

1. `OWNER TO postgres` → `OWNER TO churn_forecast`
2. `public.` → `churn_forecast.` (schema prefix on objects)
3. `Schema: public` → `Schema: churn_forecast` (comments in the dump)
4. `WITH SCHEMA public` → `WITH SCHEMA churn_forecast` (the `pg_trgm` extension line)

This writes to a new file so the original is untouched:


sed \
  -e 's/OWNER TO postgres/OWNER TO churn_forecast/g' \
  -e 's/\bpublic\./churn_forecast./g' \
  -e 's/Schema: public/Schema: churn_forecast/g' \
  -e 's/WITH SCHEMA public/WITH SCHEMA churn_forecast/g' \
  /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db.sql > /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql
echo "done — $(wc -l < /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql) lines"

Transform dump: replace schema and ownership references


done —   225843 lines


grep -c "OWNER TO postgres" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql
grep -c "OWNER TO churn_forecast" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql
grep -m5 "churn_forecast\." /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql

Verify replacements landed correctly


0
50


grep -m5 "churn_forecast\." /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql

Sample schema prefix replacements


(Bash completed with no output)


grep -m5 "ContractStatus" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql

Check schema prefix on a known type


-- Name: ContractStatus; Type: TYPE; Schema: churn_forecast; Owner: postgres
CREATE TYPE public."ContractStatus" AS ENUM (
ALTER TYPE public."ContractStatus" OWNER TO churn_forecast;
    "contractStatus" public."ContractStatus" DEFAULT 'OPEN'::public."ContractStatus" NOT NULL,


The `public.` schema prefix didn't get replaced — macOS `sed` doesn't support `\b` word boundaries. Let me fix that.


sed \
  -e 's/OWNER TO postgres/OWNER TO churn_forecast/g' \
  -e 's/public\./churn_forecast./g' \
  -e 's/Schema: churn_forecast\./Schema: churn_forecast/g' \
  -e 's/WITH SCHEMA churn_forecast\./WITH SCHEMA churn_forecast/g' \
  /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db.sql > /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql
echo "done"

Re-run transform without word boundary, fix cascading replacements


done


grep -c "OWNER TO postgres" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql
grep -c "public\." /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql
grep -m5 "ContractStatus" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql

Verify all replacements


0
0
-- Name: ContractStatus; Type: TYPE; Schema: public; Owner: postgres
CREATE TYPE churn_forecast."ContractStatus" AS ENUM (
ALTER TYPE churn_forecast."ContractStatus" OWNER TO churn_forecast;
    "contractStatus" churn_forecast."ContractStatus" DEFAULT 'OPEN'::churn_forecast."ContractStatus" NOT NULL,


Zero `public.` references and zero `OWNER TO postgres` remaining. The comment line showing `Schema: public; Owner: postgres` is just the dump's metadata comment — it's harmless, the actual DDL underneath it is correct.

Let me do one final sanity check on the actual statements:


# Check for any non-comment lines still referencing public schema or postgres ownership
grep -v "^--" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql | grep -c "public\."
grep -v "^--" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql | grep -c "OWNER TO postgres"

Check non-comment lines for remaining old references


0
0


Clean. Your transformed dump is at `~/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql`. Before loading it you'll need to make sure the `churn_forecast` role and schema exist:

```sql
CREATE ROLE churn_forecast;
CREATE SCHEMA churn_forecast AUTHORIZATION churn_forecast;
```

Then load it:

```bash
psql -U postgres -d churn_forecast -f ~/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql
```


sorry, the owner should be churn_forecast_admin not churn_forecast


sed \
  -e 's/OWNER TO postgres/OWNER TO churn_forecast_admin/g' \
  -e 's/public\./churn_forecast./g' \
  /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db.sql > /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql
echo "done"

Re-run transform with correct owner name


grep -v "^--" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql | grep -c "OWNER TO postgres"
grep -v "^--" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql | grep -c "public\."
grep -m3 "OWNER TO" /Users/steve.briggs/Documents/obsidian/db_churn_forecast.sql | grep -v "^--"

Verify owner and schema replacements


0
0
ALTER SCHEMA pgboss OWNER TO churn_forecast_admin;
ALTER TYPE pgboss.job_state OWNER TO churn_forecast_admin;
ALTER TYPE churn_forecast."ContractStatus" OWNER TO churn_forecast_admin;


All good Sir Charles — zero `postgres` owners, zero `public.` refs, all ownership set to `churn_forecast_admin`. Same load command applies, just make sure the role exists first:

```sql
CREATE ROLE churn_forecast_admin;
CREATE SCHEMA churn_forecast AUTHORIZATION churn_forecast_admin;
```


can you write me a flux deployment for this application in @/Users/steve.briggs/projects/application-deployment/flux/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/apps?


merlin
fluxcannon


Let me study the existing apps to match the pattern.


find /Users/steve.briggs/projects/application-deployment/flux/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/apps -type f | sort

List all files in the apps directory


1	---
2	apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
3	kind: Kustomization
4	metadata:
5	  name: merlin-services
6	  namespace: flux-system
7	  labels:
8	    ic-ops.com/phase: "services"
9	  annotations:
10	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "merlin"
11	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
12	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-fe0652d"
13	spec:
14	  interval: 1h
15	  timeout: 5m
16	  prune: true
17	  sourceRef:
18	    kind: OCIRepository
19	    name: merlin-services
20	  healthChecks:
21	    - apiVersion: apps/v1
22	      kind: Deployment
23	      name: merlin
24	      namespace: merlin
25

---
apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: Kustomization
metadata:
  name: merlin-services
  namespace: flux-system
  labels:
    ic-ops.com/phase: "services"
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "merlin"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-fe0652d"
spec:
  interval: 1h
  timeout: 5m
  prune: true
  sourceRef:
    kind: OCIRepository
    name: merlin-services
  healthChecks:
    - apiVersion: apps/v1
      kind: Deployment
      name: merlin
      namespace: merlin


1	resources:
2	  - oci-repo-services.yaml
3	  - flux-kustomization.yaml
4

resources:
  - oci-repo-services.yaml
  - flux-kustomization.yaml


1	---
2	apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
3	kind: OCIRepository
4	metadata:
5	  name: merlin-services
6	  namespace: flux-system
7	  annotations:
8	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "merlin"
9	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
10	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/merlin/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services"
11	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-fe0652d"
12	spec:
13	  interval: 10m
14	  ref:
15	    tag: git-fe0652d
16	  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/merlin/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services
17

---
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: merlin-services
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "merlin"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/merlin/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-fe0652d"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: git-fe0652d
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/merlin/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services


1	---
2	apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
3	kind: Kustomization
4	metadata:
5	  name: fluxcannon-services
6	  namespace: flux-system
7	  labels:
8	    ic-ops.com/phase: "services"
9	  annotations:
10	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "fluxcannon"
11	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
12	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-b84baef4"
13	spec:
14	  interval: 1h
15	  timeout: 5m
16	  prune: true
17	  sourceRef:
18	    kind: OCIRepository
19	    name: fluxcannon-services
20	  healthChecks:
21	    - apiVersion: apps/v1
22	      kind: Deployment
23	      name: fluxcannon
24	      namespace: fluxcannon
25

---
apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: Kustomization
metadata:
  name: fluxcannon-services
  namespace: flux-system
  labels:
    ic-ops.com/phase: "services"
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "fluxcannon"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-b84baef4"
spec:
  interval: 1h
  timeout: 5m
  prune: true
  sourceRef:
    kind: OCIRepository
    name: fluxcannon-services
  healthChecks:
    - apiVersion: apps/v1
      kind: Deployment
      name: fluxcannon
      namespace: fluxcannon


1	apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
2	kind: OCIRepository
3	metadata:
4	  name: fluxcannon-services
5	  namespace: flux-system
6	  annotations:
7	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "fluxcannon"
8	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
9	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/sre-deployments/fluxcannon/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services"
10	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-b84baef4"
11	spec:
12	  interval: 10m
13	  ref:
14	    tag: git-b84baef4
15	  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/sre-deployments/fluxcannon/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services
16

apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: fluxcannon-services
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "fluxcannon"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/sre-deployments/fluxcannon/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-b84baef4"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: git-b84baef4
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/sre-deployments/fluxcannon/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services


Got the pattern. The OCI URL will follow the Harbor project structure matching the image registry path (`internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast`). This app has two deployments (web + worker) so I'll include both in `healthChecks`. Creating the three files now:


Create app directory


(Bash completed with no output)


Write

resources:
  - oci-repo-services.yaml
  - flux-kustomization.yaml


File created successfully at: /Users/steve.briggs/projects/application-deployment/flux/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/apps/churn-renewal-forecast/kustomization.yaml (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)


---
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast-services
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "churn-renewal-forecast"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "latest"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: latest
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services


---
apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: Kustomization
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast-services
  namespace: flux-system
  labels:
    ic-ops.com/phase: "services"
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "churn-renewal-forecast"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "latest"
spec:
  interval: 1h
  timeout: 5m
  prune: true
  sourceRef:
    kind: OCIRepository
    name: churn-renewal-forecast-services
  healthChecks:
    - apiVersion: apps/v1
      kind: Deployment
      name: churn-renewal-forecast-web
      namespace: churn-renewal-forecast
    - apiVersion: apps/v1
      kind: Deployment
      name: churn-renewal-forecast-worker
      namespace: churn-renewal-forecast


File created successfully at: /Users/steve.briggs/projects/application-deployment/flux/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/apps/churn-renewal-forecast/oci-repo-services.yaml (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)

---
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast-services
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "churn-renewal-forecast"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "latest"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: latest
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services


File created successfully at: /Users/steve.briggs/projects/application-deployment/flux/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/apps/churn-renewal-forecast/flux-kustomization.yaml (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)

---
apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: Kustomization
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast-services
  namespace: flux-system
  labels:
    ic-ops.com/phase: "services"
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "churn-renewal-forecast"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "latest"
spec:
  interval: 1h
  timeout: 5m
  prune: true
  sourceRef:
    kind: OCIRepository
    name: churn-renewal-forecast-services
  healthChecks:
    - apiVersion: apps/v1
      kind: Deployment
      name: churn-renewal-forecast-web
      namespace: churn-renewal-forecast
    - apiVersion: apps/v1
      kind: Deployment
      name: churn-renewal-forecast-worker
      namespace: churn-renewal-forecast


Done, Sir Charles. Three files created matching the merlin/fluxcannon pattern:

- **`oci-repo-services.yaml`** — OCIRepository pointing to `registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services`
- **`flux-kustomization.yaml`** — Flux Kustomization with health checks on both `churn-renewal-forecast-web` and `churn-renewal-forecast-worker`
- **`kustomization.yaml`** — wires the two together

The tag is set to `latest` as a placeholder — the CD pipeline's `pack build --set SERVICE_VERSION=...` will update it to the actual git SHA on first deploy, same as the other apps. One thing to double-check: confirm the OCI registry path `internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services` matches what the ops `publish-and-deploy-nonprod` workflow actually publishes to — that's driven by the `deploy_dir` in `cd.yml`.


it needs a bootstrap phase and init phase similar to @/Users/steve.briggs/projects/application-deployment/flux/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/apps/saas-tenant-manager


flux-kustomization.yaml
oci-repo-bootstrap.yaml
kustomization.yaml
oci-repo-init.yaml
oci-repo-services.yaml


1	---
2	apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
3	kind: OCIRepository
4	metadata:
5	  name: saas-tenant-manager-services
6	  namespace: flux-system
7	  annotations:
8	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
9	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
10	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/services"
11	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
12	spec:
13	  interval: 10m
14	  ref:
15	    tag: git-a1af890
16	  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/services
17

---
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: saas-tenant-manager-services
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: git-a1af890
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/services


1	---
2	apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
3	kind: OCIRepository
4	metadata:
5	  name: saas-tenant-manager-init
6	  namespace: flux-system
7	  annotations:
8	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
9	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "init"
10	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/init"
11	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
12	spec:
13	  interval: 10m
14	  ref:
15	    tag: git-a1af890
16	  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/init
17

---
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: saas-tenant-manager-init
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "init"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/init"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: git-a1af890
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/init


1	---
2	apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
3	kind: OCIRepository
4	metadata:
5	  name: saas-tenant-manager-bootstrap
6	  namespace: flux-system
7	  annotations:
8	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
9	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "bootstrap"
10	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/bootstrap"
11	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
12	spec:
13	  interval: 10m
14	  ref:
15	    tag: git-a1af890
16	  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/bootstrap
17

---
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: saas-tenant-manager-bootstrap
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "bootstrap"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/bootstrap"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: git-a1af890
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/saas-tenant-manager/deploy/eks-shared-infra-use1-2/bootstrap


1	---
2	apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
3	kind: Kustomization
4	metadata:
5	  name: saas-tenant-manager-bootstrap
6	  namespace: flux-system
7	  annotations:
8	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
9	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "bootstrap"
10	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
11	spec:
12	  interval: 1h
13	  timeout: 5m
14	  prune: true
15	  sourceRef:
16	    kind: OCIRepository
17	    name: saas-tenant-manager-bootstrap
18	  healthChecks:
19	    - apiVersion: v1
20	      kind: Secret
21	      name: saas-tenant-manager-secrets
22	      namespace: saas-tenant-manager
23	---
24	apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
25	kind: Kustomization
26	metadata:
27	  name: saas-tenant-manager-init
28	  namespace: flux-system
29	  annotations:
30	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
31	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "init"
32	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
33	spec:
34	  dependsOn:
35	    - name: saas-tenant-manager-bootstrap # Explicitly setting the depenencies
36	  interval: 1h
37	  timeout: 5m
38	  wait: true # wait for bootstrap to complete before applying
39	  force: true # will replace the job if it exists to make it run, since the Job Spec is immutable
40	  prune: true
41	  sourceRef:
42	    kind: OCIRepository
43	    name: saas-tenant-manager-init
44	---
45	apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
46	kind: Kustomization
47	metadata:
48	  name: saas-tenant-manager-services
49	  namespace: flux-system
50	  annotations:
51	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
52	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
53	    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
54	spec:
55	  dependsOn:
56	    - name: saas-tenant-manager-init
57	  interval: 1h
58	  timeout: 5m
59	  wait: true
60	  prune: true
61	  sourceRef:
62	    kind: OCIRepository
63	    name: saas-tenant-manager-services
64

---
apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: Kustomization
metadata:
  name: saas-tenant-manager-bootstrap
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "bootstrap"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
spec:
  interval: 1h
  timeout: 5m
  prune: true
  sourceRef:
    kind: OCIRepository
    name: saas-tenant-manager-bootstrap
  healthChecks:
    - apiVersion: v1
      kind: Secret
      name: saas-tenant-manager-secrets
      namespace: saas-tenant-manager
---
apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: Kustomization
metadata:
  name: saas-tenant-manager-init
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "init"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
spec:
  dependsOn:
    - name: saas-tenant-manager-bootstrap # Explicitly setting the depenencies
  interval: 1h
  timeout: 5m
  wait: true # wait for bootstrap to complete before applying
  force: true # will replace the job if it exists to make it run, since the Job Spec is immutable
  prune: true
  sourceRef:
    kind: OCIRepository
    name: saas-tenant-manager-init
---
apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: Kustomization
metadata:
  name: saas-tenant-manager-services
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "saas-tenant-manager"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "git-a1af890"
spec:
  dependsOn:
    - name: saas-tenant-manager-init
  interval: 1h
  timeout: 5m
  wait: true
  prune: true
  sourceRef:
    kind: OCIRepository
    name: saas-tenant-manager-services


1	---
2	resources:
3	  - oci-repo-bootstrap.yaml
4	  - oci-repo-init.yaml
5	  - oci-repo-services.yaml
6	  - flux-kustomization.yaml
7

---
resources:
  - oci-repo-bootstrap.yaml
  - oci-repo-init.yaml
  - oci-repo-services.yaml
  - flux-kustomization.yaml


Let me also check the churn-renewal-forecast deploy directory to confirm what overlays exist.


Bash

find /Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/deploy -type f | sort

List all deploy overlay files


1	---
2	apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
3	kind: Kustomization
4	namespace: churn-renewal-forecast
5
6	resources:
7	  - ../../../base/bootstrap
8	  - ../../../base/netpol
9
10	patches:
11	  - path: serviceaccount.yaml
12

---
apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Kustomization
namespace: churn-renewal-forecast

resources:
  - ../../../base/bootstrap
  - ../../../base/netpol

patches:
  - path: serviceaccount.yaml


1	apiVersion: v1
2	kind: ServiceAccount
3	metadata:
4	  name: churn-renewal-forecast
5	  namespace: churn-renewal-forecast
6	  # annotations:
7	  #   eks.amazonaws.com/role-arn: arn:aws:iam::ACCOUNT_ID:role/churn-renewal-forecast
8

apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast
  namespace: churn-renewal-forecast
  # annotations:
  #   eks.amazonaws.com/role-arn: arn:aws:iam::ACCOUNT_ID:role/churn-renewal-forecast


find /Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap -type f | sort && echo "---" && find /Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap -type f | xargs grep -l "" | xargs -I{} sh -c 'echo "=== {} ===" && cat {}'

Read bootstrap base resources


/Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap/app-config.env
/Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap/kustomization.yaml
/Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap/namespace.yaml
/Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap/secret.yaml
/Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap/serviceaccount.yaml
---
=== /Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap/kustomization.yaml ===
apiVersion: kustomize.config.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: Kustomization

namespace: churn-renewal-forecast

resources:
  - namespace.yaml
  - serviceaccount.yaml
  - secret.yaml

configMapGenerator:
  - name: churn-renewal-forecast-config
    envs:
      - app-config.env
    options:
      disableNameSuffixHash: true
=== /Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap/namespace.yaml ===
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast
  labels:
    app.kubernetes.io/name: churn-renewal-forecast
=== /Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap/serviceaccount.yaml ===
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast
  namespace: churn-renewal-forecast
  labels:
    app.kubernetes.io/name: churn-renewal-forecast
=== /Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap/secret.yaml ===
apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1
kind: ExternalSecret
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast
  namespace: churn-renewal-forecast
  labels:
    app.kubernetes.io/name: churn-renewal-forecast
spec:
  refreshInterval: 1h
  secretStoreRef:
    name: vault
    kind: ClusterSecretStore
  target:
    name: churn-renewal-forecast
    creationPolicy: Owner
  data:
    - secretKey: DATABASE_URL
      remoteRef:
        key: /internal/churn-renewal-forecast
        property: DATABASE_URL
    - secretKey: CLERK_SECRET_KEY
      remoteRef:
        key: /internal/churn-renewal-forecast
        property: CLERK_SECRET_KEY
    - secretKey: FRONT_API_TOKEN
      remoteRef:
        key: /internal/churn-renewal-forecast
        property: FRONT_API_TOKEN
    - secretKey: FRONT_API_TOKEN_2
      remoteRef:
        key: /internal/churn-renewal-forecast
        property: FRONT_API_TOKEN_2
    - secretKey: PRODUCTBOARD_API_KEY
      remoteRef:
        key: /internal/churn-renewal-forecast
        property: PRODUCTBOARD_API_KEY
    - secretKey: SLACK_BOT_TOKEN
      remoteRef:
        key: /internal/churn-renewal-forecast
        property: SLACK_BOT_TOKEN
=== /Users/steve.briggs/projects/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/kubernetes/base/bootstrap/app-config.env ===
APP_URL=https://churn-forecast.infrastructure.immuta.io
NEXT_PUBLIC_CLERK_PUBLISHABLE_KEY=
NEXT_PUBLIC_PRODUCTBOARD_WORKSPACE=
SLACK_TEST_CHANNEL=
PG_POOL_MAX=10
PG_POOL_IDLE_TIMEOUT_MS=30000
PG_POOL_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT_MS=2000
NEXT_PUBLIC_CLERK_SIGN_IN_URL=/sign-in
NEXT_PUBLIC_CLERK_SIGN_UP_URL=/sign-up
NEXT_PUBLIC_CLERK_AFTER_SIGN_IN_URL=/
NEXT_PUBLIC_CLERK_AFTER_SIGN_UP_URL=/


Got the full picture. The bootstrap phase creates the namespace, ServiceAccount, ConfigMap, and ExternalSecret (which syncs the Vault secret). The healthCheck should wait on the `churn-renewal-forecast` Secret that ExternalSecret materializes. Now I'll rewrite all the files:


Write

---
resources:
  - oci-repo-bootstrap.yaml
  - oci-repo-init.yaml
  - oci-repo-services.yaml
  - flux-kustomization.yaml


The file /Users/steve.briggs/projects/application-deployment/flux/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/apps/churn-renewal-forecast/kustomization.yaml has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)

+---
resources:
+  - oci-repo-bootstrap.yaml
+  - oci-repo-init.yaml
- oci-repo-services.yaml
- flux-kustomization.yaml

resources:
  - oci-repo-services.yaml
  - flux-kustomization.yaml


---
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast-bootstrap
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "churn-renewal-forecast"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "bootstrap"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/bootstrap"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "latest"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: latest
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/bootstrap


File created successfully at: /Users/steve.briggs/projects/application-deployment/flux/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/apps/churn-renewal-forecast/oci-repo-bootstrap.yaml (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)

---
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast-bootstrap
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "churn-renewal-forecast"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "bootstrap"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/bootstrap"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "latest"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: latest
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/bootstrap


---
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast-init
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "churn-renewal-forecast"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "init"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/init"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "latest"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: latest
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/init


File created successfully at: /Users/steve.briggs/projects/application-deployment/flux/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/apps/churn-renewal-forecast/oci-repo-init.yaml (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)

---
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast-init
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "churn-renewal-forecast"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "init"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/init"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "latest"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: latest
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/init


---
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: OCIRepository
metadata:
  name: churn-renewal-forecast-services
  namespace: flux-system
  annotations:
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/app: "churn-renewal-forecast"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/phase: "services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/repo: "oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services"
    event.toolkit.fluxcd.io/overlay_tag: "latest"
spec:
  interval: 10m
  ref:
    tag: latest
  url: oci://registry.ic-ops.net/internal-tooling/churn-renewal-forecast/deploy/eks-platform-mgmt-use1-1/services